beVault evolves quickly.—Don't miss any news Subscribe to release notes

Data Quality & MDM

Data quality is managed over time.

A technically flawless warehouse is useless if the business distrusts the numbers. beVault allows you to declare controls on historized and multi-system data, report anomalies in actionable lists, and improve quality through corrections made in source systems.

In the platform

Declared controls, not improvised ones

beVault interface: list of quality checks with level, type and criticality
Each control carries a description, a level, a type, a severity and the expected action in case of a discrepancy.

The problem

Detect anomalies before they propagate

Quality issues most often surface downstream: a report is published, an indicator circulates, and the discrepancy only appears afterward. By then, the decision has already been made on the wrong figure.

Because controls focus on historical data gathered from multiple systems, anomalies are proactively detected and linked to a specific source, rather than a general suspicion about the warehouse.

Data quality dashboard: scores by concept and source, issues by criticality and scores by owner

The quality loop

Detect errors. Fix them at the source. Sustainably improve quality.

Quality is not a one-time state: it is a repeating loop that progresses data over time.

  1. 01

    Declare

    Completeness, uniqueness, format, value ranges, referential integrity, inter-source consistency, specific business rules: rules are declared once and applied at each load.

  2. 02

    Measure

    Controls run on historized and multi-system data, at the source, domain, or load level.

  3. 03

    Identify

    Anomalies are reported in actionable lists, qualified and assigned to the relevant owner.

  4. 04

    Fix in the source

    Data stewards correct data in the source systems where the error was introduced.

  5. 05

    Extract again

    The corrected source is extracted again, without overwriting the history of what was received.

  6. 06

    Test again

    The same controls are replayed to verify that the correction produced the expected effect.

  7. 07

    Deliver

    Quality information is linked to the data concerned and its origin, so that the reliability of an indicator is visible when it is read.

  8. 08

    Continuously improve

    Measures kept over time show a trend: quality is managed as an indicator, not an incident.

How this information is published

Master data

A customer stays the same customer

Whether it comes from the CRM, the ERP or the billing system, a customer must be recognized as the same entity, without the original record disappearing. That's the role of Business Keys and historization in the model.

beVault provides a governed foundation for reference data and multi-source consistency: identity matching across systems, shared business keys, historization, traceability to the source, and consistent views of information. This foundation works alongside your existing reference-data processes; it does not automatically replace an MDM tool already in place.

Reference data management in practice
Operational governance
Data owners, alert thresholds and decisions taken stay attached to the model rather than to a separate document.
Existing tools
beVault can consume your existing reference data as a source of truth when it's relevant for your organization.

What you get

A figure you can explain

Documented rules, historization and lineage: enough to reconstruct how a metric was produced, and from which data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quality & MDM: Sensitive Points

Should non-compliant data be rejected?

Not necessarily. The Raw Vault keeps the data as it arrived: rules identify and flag issues without silently destroying the original history, and exceptions remain visible and tracked.

Can we keep our existing MDM tool?

Yes. beVault can work with your existing reference-data processes or MDM tool when it's relevant; it doesn't automatically replace them.

Who defines the rules?

Technical teams define technical controls, business teams contribute functional rules, according to the governance model actually in place in your organization.

How do you demonstrate compliance during an audit?

Data Lineage, history tracking and documented rules make it possible to reconstruct how a metric was produced at a given date. Compliance with a specific regulatory framework then depends on your own scope.

Next step

Quality rules only mean something once tested against your actual data.

See beVault in your context